我国刑事诉讼中儿童证言证明力的补强——以性侵未成年人案件为例  

The Corroboration Requirement of Children's Testimony in Chinese Criminal Procedure:Taking the Child Sexual Abuse Cases as an Example

作　　者：屈玉含 QU Yu-han(Institute of Criminal Law Sciences,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院,北京100875

出　　处：《山东青年政治学院学报》2020年第6期65-71,共7页Journal of Shandong Youth University of Political Science

摘　　要：近年来,我国性侵未成年人等案件仍然呈现高发态势。心理、程序因素的混合作用导致儿童证言失真风险的产生,同时,严格的印证证明模式在“孤证”或证据“一对一”案件中功能缺失,儿童证言难以作为定案依据,制约着合法追诉的进行,需要运用补强证据规则来弥补缺口。在我国刑事诉讼中,儿童证言证明力的补强存在立法上的空白,相关司法实践中存在应被补强的儿童证言的范围不明、用以补强儿童证言的证据条件不明、儿童证言的补强标准不明、儿童证言的补强程序不明等具体问题,上述问题亟待解决。In recent years,child sexual abuse cases in China are still on the rise.The distortion risk of children's testimony arises from the combination of psychological and procedural factors.At the same time,the function of strict verification model is lacking in the case of solitary evidence or contradictory evidence.Children's testimony is difficult to be used as the basis of the case,which restricts the legal prosecution,so the corroboration requirement should be used to fill the gap.In Chinese criminal procedure,there is a legislative gap in the corroboration of children's testimony.In judicial practice,the provisions of the supplementary children's testimony's scope,the corroborative evidence,the degree of corroborative evidence and the corroborative procedure are not clear.The above problems need to be solved as soon as possible.

关 键 词：儿童证言 补强证据规则 性侵未成年人犯罪 印证 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]