夏济安现代文学研究的开放性——以史观的差异与对话为中心  

The Openness of T.A.Hsia’s Study of Chinese Modern Literature:Centering on the Differences and Dialogues from the Perspective of History

作　　者：张德强[1] ZHANG Deqiang(School of Humanities,Nanjing University of Arts,Nanjing 210013,China)

机构地区：[1]南京艺术学院人文学院,江苏南京210013

出　　处：《苏州教育学院学报》2020年第5期84-91,共8页Journal of Suzhou College of Education

摘　　要：在美国汉学中国现代文学研究一脉中,夏济安的学术工作有着开创意义。由于离散背景与英语写作带来的便利,在总结“五四”文脉时,他一反现代文学研究主流史观和立场,与其多有歧异和对话。他对“五四以来的浪漫主义”加以批判性反思;对现代文学分期与主潮亦有独到看法;对“礼拜六派”文学价值的重视和肯定,在20世纪五六十年代的学术环境下可谓极富前瞻性,体现了夏济安在现代文学研究方面的开放性姿态与个人主义立场。T.A.Hsia’s academic work is of pioneering significance in the study of Chinese modern literature in American sinology.Because of the convenience brought by the discrete background and English writing,when summarizing the context of the May 4th Movement,he opposed the mainstream historical view and standpoint of modern literature research.He held many differences and dialogues with the mainstream thoughts.He made a critical reflection on“Romanticism since the May 4th Movement”.He also had a unique view on the stages and main trend of modern literature.In the academic environment of the 1950s and 1960s,he attached great importance to,and affirmed the literary value of the“Saturday School”,which reflected his open attitude and individualistic stand in the study of modern literature.

关 键 词：夏济安 夏志清 文学史 “礼拜六派” 《黑暗的闸门:中国左翼文学运动研究》 

分 类 号：I206.6[文学—中国文学]