基于经典测量理论的《护理学导论》课程试卷质量评价、成绩分析及教学思考  

Score analysis and quality evaluation of examination paper based on classical test theory for Introduction to Nursing and teaching reflections

作　　者：杨洁凤 文秀 杨敏 荆文华 陈湘玉[1] Yang Jiefeng;Wen Xiu;Yang Min;Jing Wenhua;Chen Xiangyu(Department of Nursing,Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital,Nanjing University School of Medicine,Nanjing 210008,China;Department of Nursing,Nanjing University Jinling College,Nanjing 210089,China)

机构地区：[1]南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院护理部,210008 [2]南京大学金陵学院护理学系,210089

出　　处：《中华医学教育探索杂志》2020年第10期1237-1240,共4页Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research

摘　　要：目的评价某院校《护理学导论》课程期末试卷质量、分析学生成绩,为加强课程建设和持续改进教学质量提供客观依据。方法应用SPSS 22.0软件统计分析相关数据,对某院校58名护理专业本科生《护理学导论》课程成绩、不同知识点得分情况进行描述性统计,运用Pearson相关分析法分析学生考试成绩与平时成绩间的关系;基于经典测量理论测量期末试卷的难度系数、区分度、信度和效度,评价试卷质量。结果学生平时成绩、考试成绩及总成绩的平均分为93.66、67.07、75.19;考试成绩最高分89,最低分52,中位数65,及格率93.10%,60~69、70~79分数段的学生人数分别为33人、15人;考核的20个知识点中,有10个知识点及格率<60%,其中有5个<50%;学生考试成绩与平时成绩呈正相关(r=0.973,P<0.001);期末试卷难度系数P=0.329、区分度D=0.256、信度r=0.734。结论期末试卷总体符合教学要求、质量较佳,学生平时成绩较理想,但学生最终考核成绩整体偏低,对知识点的理解分析和综合运用较差。Objective To evaluate the quality of the final examination paper of the course Introduction to Nursing and analyze the students'performance,so as to provide objective basis for strengthening the course construction and continuously improving the teaching quality.Methods SPSS 22.0 software was used to analyze the relevant data,descriptive statistics was carried out on the course scores and scores of different knowledge points of 58 nursing undergraduates in a college,and Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyze the relationship between students'examination scores and their usual scores.Based on the classical measurement theory,the difficulty coefficient,differentiation,reliability and validity of final examination papers were measured.Results The average scores of students'usual performance,examination scores and total scores were 93.66,67.07 and 75.19.The highest score of examination was 89,the lowest score was 52,the median was 65,the passing rate was 93.10%,and the number of students in 60-69 and 70-79 was 33 and 15 respectively.Among the 20 knowledge points examined,the passing rate of 10 knowledge points was less than 60%,and 5 of them<50%.There was a positive correlation between the test scores and the usual scores(r=0.973,P<0.001).The difficulty coefficient of the final examination was P=0.329,the discrimination degree D=0.256,and the reliability r=0.734.Conclusion The final examination are generally in line with the teaching requirements and are of good quality,but the final examination scores of the students are generally low.The students'usual scores are ideal,and their understanding,analysis and comprehensive application of knowledge points are poor.

关 键 词：成绩分析 试卷质量评价 经典测量理论 教学思考 护理学导论 

分 类 号：R47[医药卫生—护理学] G424.1[医药卫生—临床医学]