检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:滕明俊[1] Teng Mingjun(Beijing National Day School,Beijing,100039)
机构地区:[1]北京十一学校,北京100039
出 处:《考试研究》2020年第6期71-76,共6页Examinations Research
摘 要:从课程框架、选课机制、课程内容、课程实施、课程评价与大学录取等方面对北京新高考方案下的课程模式与IBDP的课程模式进行比较和分析:北京新高考课程模式符合中国国情,提供丰富的课程选择且兼具深度,评价手段趋向丰富和多元化,引导学生从“解题”向“解决问题”转变;IBDP课程注重“全人”培养和通识教育,为学生提供丰富选择性的同时增加选修模块,建立本学科与实际生产生活之间的联系,校内成绩纳入总成绩的标准化做法等可为新高考改革提供参考。The Curriculum Model of Beijing’s new college entrance examination and IBDP program are analyzed and compared in the aspects of curriculum framework,course selection mechanism,curriculum content,curriculum implementation,curriculum evaluation and university admission.The curriculum model of Beijing’s new college entrance examination fits with local conditions,providing rich curriculum with depth and guiding students to change from“solving problem on paper”to“solving real problem in practice”.IBDP program focuses on the“whole person”cultivation and liberal arts education.It offers students with rich choices and adds elective modules to connect the subject with daily life and industry.Standardized practice of integrating internal assessment within school into the total score can provide beneficial reference for the reform of the new college entrance examination.
关 键 词:新高考 国际文凭大学预科项目 课程模式 比较
分 类 号:G424.74[文化科学—课程与教学论]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40