《汉书·艺文志》包孕的“艺术”及其历史观  

The“Art”and Historical View Subsumed in Hanshu·Yiwenzhi

作　　者：周珩帮 Zhou Hengbang(College of Arts of Jiangsu Normal University,Xuzhou 221116)

机构地区：[1]江苏师范大学文学院,徐州221116

出　　处：《新疆艺术学院学报》2020年第4期9-19,共11页Journal of Xinjiang Arts University

基　　金：教育部人文社科青年项目《汉唐书画史著典范阐释的理路嬗变研究》(19YJC760168);江苏高校哲学社会科学研究专题项目《汉唐时期文艺史学观念演进研究》的阶段成果。

摘　　要：在从历史观念、写作体例与方法上说,前范式期与范式成熟期的艺术史著,与正史艺文志传形成了共构与互补,其中,《汉书·艺文志》包前孕后的思想内涵及学术地位,使其在诸文本序列中显得尤为重要:由其定型的传统"艺术"范畴,涵括其中的早期圣王治艺的古典观、艺术发生发展的数象原理观、艺术依托王官政治而存的制度文化观,既传承先秦诸子思想,又不断规约、关照魏晋及以后的艺术实践,不仅为中国传统艺术史写作提供了一套独特的理论与方法,也为其后各代文艺志传的修撰提供学术参照;由其完善的引经证史、志传结合的史学方法,分类著录、序目相次的史学体例,也为其后的艺术史著所继承。From the perspective of historical concepts,writing styles and methods,art history works in the pre-paradigm period and the mature paradigm period form a common structure and complement with the official history,art,literature and chronicle.Among them,the ideological connotation and academic status of Hanshu·Yiwenzhi make it particularly important in the sequence of texts:By the traditional stereotypes of"art"category,including the early classical view,digital image theory of the art development view,systematic and cultural view relying on nobility and politics.It inherits thoughts of scholars during the pre-Qin period,and constantly makes stipulations,keeps an eye on art practice of Wei and Jin dynasties and later,which results in not only providing a series of unique theory and method for the Chinese traditional art history writing,but providing academic reference for the subsequent literature records of every generation.The complete historiography method of combining and citing classics and annals,and historical style of Classification and cataloguing also inherited by the subsequent art historical books.

关 键 词：《汉书·艺文志》 艺术 艺术史 观念 

分 类 号：J120.9[艺术—艺术理论]