刑事诉讼中“有专门知识的人”争议问题的实践反思  

Rethinking controversial issues of the person with special knowledge in criminal procedure

作　　者：韩旭[1] 罗维鹏[1] Han Xu;Luo Weipeng(Law School of Sichuan University)

机构地区：[1]四川大学法学院,成都610041

出　　处：《证据科学》2020年第5期534-545,共12页Evidence Science

基　　金：国家社科基金重点项目“刑事庭审证据调查规则研究”(16AFX012)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：自2012年《刑事诉讼法》新设“有专门知识的人”制度以来,理论界和实务界对“有专门知识的人”如何有效参与庭审展开了不少探索,却一直没有达成共识,实践做法也不够规范和统一。“有专门知识的人”参与诉讼的理论和实践需要进一步明确以下几个重要问题:一是区分“有专门知识的人”参与庭审的出庭资格和专业资质。二是承认“有专门知识的人”具有专家辅助人和专家证人的复合主体身份。三是根据具体情况区分“有专门知识的人”作为专家辅助人和专家证人所提的书面意见和庭审意见的不同效力。四是根据“有专门知识的人”不同的诉讼身份和功能,完善相应的庭审调查规则。Since the concept of the Person With Special Knowledge introduced in 2012 Criminal Procedure Law,scholars and practitioners have taken great efforts in exploring how the person with special knowledge could effectively participate in criminal trial.However,no consensus on this issue has been reached,and judicial practices have not been standardized and unified.At present,the following important issues need to be further clarified in theory and practice:i)distinguishing the qualification of the person with special knowledge from the expert;ii)acknowledging that the person with special knowledge has a compound role of expert assistant and expert witness;iii)distinguishing the different effects between the written opinions given by the person with special knowledge as an expert assistant and the expert witness testimony as the expert witness;iv)setting relevant trial investigation rules in accordance with the different litigation roles of the person with special knowledge.

关 键 词：有专门知识的人 专家辅助人 专家证人 法庭调查 

分 类 号：D915.13[政治法律—诉讼法学]