今古文经学之争对汉代史学的影响——以《史记》《汉书》为中心  

The Influence of the Controversy between Modern Classics and Ancient Chinese Classics on the Historiography of Han Dynasty--Focus on“Historical Records”and“Han Shu”

作　　者：黄海涛[1] 庞伟伟[2] Huang Haitao;Pang Weiwei

机构地区：[1]云南省社会科学院人事教育处 [2]云南国土资源职业学院马克思主义学院

出　　处：《理论界》2020年第12期67-74,共8页Theory Horizon

摘　　要：两汉经学分为今文经学和古文经学两派,二者起初仅为今文经和古文经版本的不同,后来逐渐发展成为两个不同的学派,并产生了激烈的论争。今古文经学之争是汉代经学史上的大事,当然会对史学产生重大的影响:一方面,今文经学与古文经学的发展为史学提供了丰富的史料来源,有助于史学家辨伪存真;另一方面,今文经学与古文经学的思想差异也使得史学在不同时期呈现出不同的时代特征和思想风格。Han Dynasty’s Classics are divided into two schools:Modern Classics and Ancient Chinese Classics,the difference between Jin Wen Jing and Gu Wen Jing were only differ in version at first,later gradually developed into two different schools And had a fierce debate.The controversy between Modern Classics and Ancient Chinese Classics is a major event in the history of classics in the Han Dynasty,and of course it would have a significant impact on Historiography:On the one hand,the development of Modern Classics and Ancient Chinese Classics has provided a rich source of historical data for historiography,which helps historians to distinguish between false and true;On the other hand,the ideological differences between Modern Classics and Ancient Chinese Classics also make historiography present different era characteristics and ideological styles in different periods.

关 键 词：今古文经学之争 汉代史学 《史记》 《汉书》 

分 类 号：B2[哲学宗教—中国哲学]