没有标准答案,只需解决问题--以开卷的形式、开放的试题探寻线上考试之道  

NO STANDARD SOLUTIONS, BUT TO SOLVE PROBLEMS——EXPLORATION OF ONLINE EXAM IN OPEN-BOOK AND OPEN-MIND FORM

作　　者：林方[1] 聂娅[1] LIN Fang;NIE Ya(Physics College,Sichuan University,Chengdu,Sichuan 610064)

机构地区：[1]四川大学物理学院,四川成都610064

出　　处：《物理与工程》2020年第5期43-49,共7页Physics and Engineering

基　　金：教改项目“四川大学未来教学研究项目——建设与本科基础教学相融合的跨学科科研训练平台”和“全国教育科学‘十三五’规划2019年度教育部重点课题,‘互联网+教育背景下跨区域同步教学对教育生态的重构研究’子课题——大学物理在线开放课程的有效评价体系的研究(DCA190331-1007)”支持。

摘　　要：本文以本学期一门理工科大学物理类课程线上半期考试为例,详尽分析了以开放性问题为试题、开卷为形式的线上考试的构思、设计和结果。本次半期考试以"开放"为核心特点,试题设计取材于生活,立足于课程内容,着重考核学生综合运用所学知识和技能解决实际问题的能力;开卷考试,允许学生查阅任何资料,也允许学生之间交流,同时强调"借鉴"和"抄袭"的区别,针对抄袭行为采取专门的甄别和惩罚手段;试题没有标准答案,老师根据模型正确性、逻辑完整性和是否定量、是否存在抄袭等进行评分。本文意在探寻有别于传统考试思路的线上考试之道,同时借此探索本科基础课教学改革之道。An online mid-term examination of college physics course is taken as an example in this paper to analyze in detail the conception, design and results of online exam in open-book and open-mind form. The questions in the exam, which can be characterized by ‘openness’, were inspired from life, based on the course content, and focused on the assessment of students’ ability to comprehensively apply the knowledge and skills they have learned to solve practical problems. Students were allowed to consult any information, even to discuss with each other;as well, the difference between ‘reference’ and ‘plagiarism’ was emphasized, and special measures would be adopted for plagiarism. There is no standard solutions to the test questions. Scores will be given according to the correctness of model, the logical integrity, quantitative calculation, and whether there is plagiarism. The purpose of this paper is to explore the way of online examination that is different from the traditional one, and the way to further reform the teaching of undergraduate basic courses.

关 键 词：大学物理 线上考试 开卷 开放 

分 类 号：G434[文化科学—教育学] O4-4[文化科学—教育技术学]