探析拟制自认的类型及法理基础——兼论新《民事证据规定》第4条  

To Explore the Types and Legal Basis of False Admission:also on Article 4 of the New Provisions on Civil Evidence

作　　者：庞宇培 PANG Yu-pei(School of Law,Tianjin Normal University,Tianjin 300387,China)

机构地区：[1]天津师范大学法学院,天津300387

出　　处：《宿州教育学院学报》2020年第6期80-84,共5页Journal of Suzhou Education Institute

摘　　要：作为当事人的一种诉讼行为,自认这一重要角色在民事诉讼中不可缺失。然而,拟制自认并不能与自认划等号,它是立法者出于某种诉讼目的或为实现一定的诉讼价值,将某些情形以法律的形式规定为视作自认,从而在法律上产生自认的效果。大陆法系主要国家和地区的立法均对拟制自认有较为详尽的规定,也对该制度进行了类型化分析,而我国的相关理论和规定则相对单薄。基于我国的立法现状,从拟制自认的类型化分析出发,阐明拟制自认的法理依据和理论源泉,同时在此基础上探讨我国拟制自认的相关规定,促使拟制自认能够发挥出其应有的价值与优势。For the purpose of some litigation or to realize some litigation value,the legislator makes up some situations which are not self-admission as self-admission in the form of law.The legislation of the main countries and regions of the civil law system has made a type analysis of the situation of false self-admission,which can be divided into three types:non-disputation,non-statement and non-appearance on the date of speech and speech debate.At the same time,argumentation,litigation promotion obligation and complete obligation constitute the legal basis and theoretical source of fiction admission.Based on the status quo of China's legislation,this paper expounds the legal basis and theoretical source of fiction admission from the analysis of genre of fiction admission,and on this basis discusses the relevant provisions of fiction admission in China,so as to make fiction admission give play to its due value and advantages.

关 键 词：拟制自认 法理基础 辩论主义 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]