大城市(Ⅰ、Ⅱ型)流动儿童义务教育的困境与对策研究  

Big Cities(Ⅰ,Ⅱtype)the Plight of Migrant Children Compulsory Education and Countermeasures Research

作　　者：朱海涛 ZHU Hai-tao(Xuzhou Institute of Technology,Journal Editorial Department,Xuzhou 221000,China)

机构地区：[1]徐州工程学院学报编辑部,江苏徐州221000

出　　处：《青海师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2020年第5期131-138,共8页Journal of Qinghai Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究基金(专题)项目“多元视域下大城市(Ⅱ型)流动儿童入学困境及实现路径研究——以苏北地区为例”(2020SJA1112);江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究基金(专题)项目“苏北地区义务教育城乡发展对策研究”(2018SJA1009);2020年度江苏省哲学社会科学应用研究精品工程课题“教育综合改革视域下江苏义务教育质量提升研究”(20SYC141);江苏省第六批教育改革发展战略性与政策性研究课题重点基金项目“推进义务教育一体化、优质均衡发展”。

摘　　要：流动儿童义务教育的"两为主"政策的出台,极大地缓解我国流动儿童义务教育的矛盾问题。当前大城市(Ⅰ型、Ⅱ型)面临着流动儿童义务教育的多元困境:在新的城镇化政策背景下,大城市承接了"超大""特大"城市外溢的流动人口,成为流动儿童聚集的"洼地";在"两为主"政策的推进下,公办学校成为承载大城市流动儿童义务教育的主要"容器"。而造成如此困局的深层因素大致有四:事权与责权的不匹配、准入政策门槛的降低、统计数据口径的误读、财政支持政策不畅。"破局"之策则需要从造成"困局"的核心因素入手:完善教育政策,拓展办学渠道,规范统计数据,理顺财政政策。The introduction of the"two-oriented"policy of migrant children’s compulsory education has greatly alleviated the contradiction of migrant children’s compulsory education in our country.At present,the big cities(typeⅠand TypeⅡ)are facing the multi-dimensional dilemma of Migrant Children:under the background of the new urbanization policy,the big cities have accepted the overflow of migrant population from the"super-large"and"super-large"cities,under the promotion of the"two-oriented"policy,public schools have become the main"container"to carry the floating children’s compulsory education in the big cities.There are four deep-seated reasons for this dilemma:The mismatch of power and responsibility,the lowering of the threshold of access policy,the misreading of statistical data,and the lack of financial support policy.The strategy of"breaking the deadlock"needs to start with the core factors which cause the"dilemma":Perfecting the Education Policy,expanding the school-running channel,standardizing the statistical data,straightening out the financial policy.

关 键 词：大城市(Ⅰ、Ⅱ型) 流动儿童 义务教育 困境 对策 

分 类 号：G64[文化科学—高等教育学]