检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王洋 WANG Yang(Department of Neurology,Chifeng City Hospital,Chifeng Inner Mongolia 024000,China)
出 处:《中国继续医学教育》2021年第3期195-198,共4页China Continuing Medical Education
摘 要:目的研究神经内科中风险管理的应用。方法回顾性选取2016年11月—2019年11月我院患者100例,依据护理方法分为风险管理组(n=50)和常规管理组(n=50)两组,统计分析两组患者的护理效果、不良风险事件发生情况。结果风险管理组患者的基础护理、消毒卫生评分(94.3±15.8)分、(96.7±13.6)分均显著高于常规管理组(68.7±13.2)分、(76.4±13.2)分(P <0.05)。在不良风险事件发生率方面,风险管理组为2.0%(1/50),常规管理组为14.0%(7/50),前者显著低于后者(P <0.05)。结论神经内科中风险管理的应用效果较常规管理好,更能有效提升护理效果,将低不良风险事件发生率,值得在临床推广应用。Objective To study the application of risk management in neurology department.Methods 100 cases of patients from November 2016 to November 2019 in our hospital were retrospectively selected.According to the nursing methods,they were divided into two groups:risk management group(n=50)and routine management group(n=50).The nursing effects and adverse risk events of the two groups were statistically analyzed.Results The scores of basic nursing and disinfection of the risk management group(94.3±15.8) and (96.7±13.6) were significantly higherthan the routine management group (68.7±13.2) and(76.4±13.2) (P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse eventswas 2.0% (1/50) in the risk management group and14.0% (7/50) in the routine management group. Theformer was significantly lower than the latter (P < 0.05).Conclusion The application effect of risk management inneurology department is better than routine management,it can more effectively improve the nursing effect andreduce the incidence of adverse events, which is worthyof clinical promotion and application.
关 键 词:神经内科 风险管理 常规管理 基础护理 消毒卫生 不良风险事件
分 类 号:R197[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.70