王阳明是否与陈白沙一脉相承?——对束景南《阳明大传——“心”的救赎之路》“乙丑之悟”的检讨  

Did Wang Yangming Follow Chen Baisha Ideologically?

作　　者：马寄 毕天航 Ma Ji;Bi Tian-hang

机构地区：[1]闽南师范大学马克思主义学院,福建漳州363000

出　　处：《五邑大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第1期62-66,94,共6页Journal of Wuyi University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金西部项目“明代气化心学研究”(批准号:19XZX005)之阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：在黄宗羲“有明之学,至白沙始入精微……至阳明而后大”的暗示下,后世不少学人认为白沙、阳明一脉相承,束景南在《阳明大传——“心”的救赎之路》一书中亦持这一观点。束景南这一观点建基于其新见“乙丑之悟”之上。本文聚焦“乙丑之悟”,检讨白沙、阳明是否存在一脉相承的关系。首先,“乙丑之悟”之说存在着三个罅漏。其次,依据乙丑年及此前一段时间阳明话语,阳明思想回归儒家,而非白沙心学。最后,束景南采取四种策略,论证乙丑年阳明接受了白沙“心法”——“默坐澄心,体认天理”。通过一一辨析,认为“默坐澄心,体认天理”并非白沙“心法”,由是推断阳明接受白沙“心法”一说未免过于武断。Influenced by Huang Zongxi’s statement“Confucianism in the Ming Dynasty was made sophisticated and subtle by Chen Baisha and made grand by Wang Yangming”,many scholars of the later generations believed that Chen Baisha and Wang Yangming were in the same ideological line.Shu Jingnan in his The Road to Redemption also holds this view.This article focuses on“the Yichou year’s enlightenment”and examines whether Baisha and Yangming were on the same ideological line.First,there are three flaws in the“enlightenment in th Yichou year”.Second,according to Wang Yangming’s discourse made prior to and after that year,Wang’s thought returned to Confucianism and not to Chen Baisha’s study of the mind.Finally,Shu adopted four strategies to demonstrate that in the year of Yichou,Yang Ming accepted Chen Baisha’s“Study of the Mind Method”--“mediating to purify the mind and understand the heavenly principles.”An analysis reveals that mediation with a view to understanding heavenly principles did not belong in Chen Baisha’s study of the mind method.Therefore,the conclusion that Wang Yangming accepted Chen Baisha’s study of the mind method is too arbitrary.

关 键 词：陈白沙 王阳明 一脉相承 “乙丑之悟” 

分 类 号：B248[哲学宗教—中国哲学]