肯定美学的环境伦理学论证及其理论效应——以罗尔斯顿为考察中心  

Environmental Ethics Argumentation for Positive Aesthetics and Its Theoretical Effect: An Exploration Centered on Holmes Rolston Ⅲ

作　　者：周思钊 Zhou Sizhao

机构地区：[1]青岛大学文学院,山东青岛266071

出　　处：《鄱阳湖学刊》2021年第1期98-107,127,128,共12页Journal of Poyang Lake

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“西方自然美学通史”(19ZDA044)子课题之一“西方自然美学通论”。

摘　　要：肯定美学是当代西方环境美学领域最富有标识性的理论成果,但是自它诞生之初,便面临着合法性问题。为了解决这一问题,罗尔斯顿为肯定美学提供了富有辩证色彩的环境伦理学论证,其内在逻辑在于三重转变:一是将肯定美学转变为伦理学命题;二是将肯定美学转变为中观视野问题;三是承认生态系统具有将丑转变为美的功能。罗尔斯顿的论证将环境美学与环境伦理学结合起来,发展出一种关于自然的深层美学,为当代环境美学发展提供了新的理论增长点,同时也揭示出肯定美学蕴含着丰富的生态美学意蕴,因而可以将其整合进中国生态美学建构当中。Positive aesthetics is one of the most marked theoretical achievements in the field of contemporary western environmental aesthetics. However, it has always been haunted with the problem of legitimacy since its birth. In order to deal with this problem, Holmes Rolston Ⅲ provides dialectical argumentation of environmental ethics for positive aesthetics. The internal logic of his argumentation lies in a three-fold shift: first, taking positive aesthetics as an ethical proposition;second, taking positive aesthetics as a middle scale question;third, admitting that ecological system has the function of transforming ugliness into beauty. Rolston’s argumentation combines environmental aesthetics and environmental ethics, develops into a kind of profound aesthetics of nature, and provides a new theoretical growth point for the development of contemporary environmental aesthetics. Rolston’s argumentation also reveals that positive aesthetics is imbued with rich eco-aesthetic connotations, so we can learn from it to integrate positive aesthetics into the construction of Chinese ecological aesthetics.

关 键 词：肯定美学 环境伦理学 罗尔斯顿 化丑为美 深层美学 

分 类 号：B82-058[哲学宗教—伦理学]