认知符号学:重新思考文学艺术的新路径  

Cognitive Semiotics: Rethinking of New Path for Literature and Art

作　　者：马大康[1] Ma Dakang

机构地区：[1]温州大学人文学院

出　　处：《江海学刊》2021年第1期232-237,255,共7页Jianghai Academic Journal

基　　金：国家社科基金项目“文艺符号学新视界”(项目号:20FZWB019)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：符号首先是人与世界的"关系模式",是人把握世界的中介。人类符号建模的发生过程存在三个序列:行为建模、语言建模、符号建模。其中,语言诞生是关键。语言具有对象化及符号化能力,它不仅将行为建模转化为"行为语言",并且协同行为建模共同构造了其他所有符号。人的世界和文学艺术世界就是由各式各样的符号建构的,因此,最终都可以用"行为语言"与"言语行为"二维张力结构加以解释。这种二维张力结构决定着:人与世界之关系既是一元的,又是二元的。西方理论之所以难以摆脱语言中心主义、理性中心主义,难以超越二元思维,其原因就在于忽略了行为语言与言语行为存在着实质性差异,认为语言可以单独解释一切其他符号,这就势必走向谬误。唯有从行为语言与言语行为的二维张力结构入手,才可以对文学艺术和文化实践做出更加贴切的新阐释。Symbol is the“relationship model”between human beings and the world,and it is the mediators through which human beings grasp the world.There are three sequences in the process of human symbolic modeling:behavior modeling,language modeling,and symbolic modeling.The birth of language is the key process.The human world and the world of literature and art are constructed by a variety of symbols,and can therefore be explained by the two-dimensional tension between“behavior language”and“speech act”.This two-dimensional tension structure determines that the relationship between human beings and the world is both monistic and dualistic.The western theory believes that language can explain all other symbols alone,which is bound to be fallacious.Only by starting from the two-dimensional tension structure between behavioral language and speech act,can we make a more relevant new interpretation of literature,art and cultural practice.

关 键 词：文学艺术 认知符号学 符号建模 关系模式 

分 类 号：H0[语言文字—语言学] J01[艺术—艺术理论]