检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨佩尧 YANG Pei-yao(Law School of Wuhan University,Wuhan,Hubei 430072,China)
出 处:《时代法学》2021年第1期59-69,共11页Presentday Law Science
基 金:国家社科基金青年项目“数字经济下我国劳动法面临的挑战与转型研究”(19CFX077)的阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:雇员按雇主指示在工作场所外待命能否被认定为工作时间及应否获得工资等权益保护,是劳动法上的典型难题。这一问题可分别从劳动基准法和劳动合同法两个视角认识和解决:雇员在工作场所外待命,乃是受雇主拘束管理的劳动给付行为,应计为劳基法上的工作时间,使其享有最高工时限制、最低工资保障、劳动保护和工伤权益保障及必要休息时间等对价权益;而待命工资支付问题,本质上属于劳动力市场上的交易行为,应允许劳雇双方依劳动合同法“自愿、合法、公平”原则协商解决。It is a typical problem whether employees' standby-time outside the workplace can be recognized as working time.According to the employer's instructions,employees' standby outside the workplace is the behavior under the employer's restraint management,it should be counted as the working time and enjoy the rights and interests such as the maximum working hours limit,the necessary rest time,the minimum wage,the labor protection and the compensation for industrial-injury in accordance with the labor standard law.While the wage of standby-time outside the workplace is essentially a transaction in the labor market,the employers and the employees should be allowed to solve it through consultation in accordance within the labor contract law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7