检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陶朗逍 TAO Langxiao(Law School,University of International Business and Economics,Beijing 100029,China)
出 处:《东北大学学报(社会科学版)》2021年第2期89-95,共7页Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)
摘 要:现代国家治理企业违法存在严格处罚模式、裁量不罚模式与和解合规模式三种。中国目前属于严格处罚模式和裁量不罚模式的二元共治,存在执法的社会负效应大、执法的后期效果不佳、难以适应国际经贸发展要求这三大主要问题。中国的执法理念正在经历由报应性正义到兼容恢复性正义的转变,引入和解合规模式能够更有效治理企业违法。在制度层面,应当建立企业犯罪暂缓起诉程序,全面推行企业违法的行政和解制度,明确合规在和解中的核心地位。There are three types of law enforcement mode for governing corporate lawbreakers in modern countries:the strict sensation mode,the discretionary non-punishment mode,and the settlement and compliance mode.At present,China employs a co-governance method in adopting the strict sensation mode together with the discretionary non-punishment mode.The duality of law enforcement results in great social consequences,poor long-term effects,and difficulties in meeting the needs of international economic and trade development.The judicial concept underlying law enforcement in China is undergoing a transition from retributive justice to compatible restorative justice.In order to govern corporation misconducts effectively in China,the settlement and compliance mode should be introduced at the system level,including setting up the deferred prosecution procedures for corporate crimes,fully implementing the administrative settlement mechanism for corporate wrongdoers,and clarifying the core position of compliance in settlements.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.234