检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘倩[1] 李颖[1] LIU Qian;LI Ying(School of International Studies,Hangzhou Normal University,Hangzhou Zhejiang 311121)
机构地区:[1]杭州师范大学外国语学院,浙江杭州311121
出 处:《电化教育研究》2021年第4期45-52,共8页E-education Research
基 金:2018年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“认知、情意特征交织下的慕课学习者体验再建构研究”(项目编号:18YJC880054)。
摘 要:长期以来,在线课程研究与实践一直被“高辍学率”困扰。传统文献对其原因的消极解读是在线课程定位失准、对在线互动机制理解片面、在线学习评价主体错位的结果。因此,本研究对将“高辍学率”理解为在线课程和课程学习者失败的合理性提出质疑,从学习者投资理论的视角,对在线课程与学习者的关系进行重新诠释。研究发现,在线课程“辍学”是学习者的一种主动选择,同时也是线下教师策略整合及在线课程资源属性的体现。基于“高辍学率”现象中隐藏的积极意涵,研究进一步从教学组织过程、学习评价模式、共同体实践等方面对在线课程学习机制进行了重构。Online course research and practice has long been plagued by"high dropout rates".The negative interpretation of traditional literature is the result of inaccurate positioning of online courses,a partial understanding of online interaction mechanism and the dislocation of online learning evaluation subjects.This study therefore questions the rationality of interpreting"high dropout rate"as the failure of online courses and course learners,and reinterprets the relationship between online courses and learners from the perspective of learner investment theory.The study finds that"dropout"from online courses is an active choice of learners,and it is also a reflection of offline teachers'strategy integration and the attributes of online course resources.Based on the positive connotations hidden in the phenomenon of"high dropout rate",the study further reconstructs the learning mechanism of online courses in terms of teaching and learning organization process,learning evaluation model and community practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.2.88