结构主义与主体哲学视野下的逻辑漏洞和偏差——反思波德里亚在《物体系》中对古物的意义分析  

Logical Loopholes and Deviations from the Perspective of Structuralism and Subjective Philosophy:Reflections on Baudrillard's Analysis of the Significance of Antiquities in The System of Objects

作　　者：潘万里 PAN Wan-li(College of Humanities,Guangxi University of Arts,Nanning Guangxi 530007,China)

机构地区：[1]广西艺术学院人文学院,广西南宁530007

出　　处：《廊坊师范学院学报（社会科学版）》2021年第1期81-87,共7页Journal of Langfang Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：2018年国家社科基金艺术学重大项目“当代中国艺术体系研究”(18ZD03)子项目“当代中国映像艺术体系的形成与结构”;2020年广西哲学社会科学规划研究课题自筹项目“抗战时期中国西南地区民族摄影研究”(20FXW002);2019年广西艺术学院高层次人才科研启动项目“抗战时期中国西部地区民族摄影研究”(GCRC201907)成果。

摘　　要：波德里亚在《物体系》中虽然通过对古物的"历史性"气氛价值和意指"起源神话"的象征价值的论述,为其在现代物体系中找到了合法持存的依据,但是他却遵循结构主义的系统逻辑,独断地将古物的意向性所指缩减为空洞的物符码,并将其纳入消费社会之中展开凌厉的批判。再加上其主体哲学视野的限制,最终导致了其对消费社会中物体系(包括古物)的意义分析,因为忽略掉了主体间性的基本维度和"解分化"的可能性而陷入绝望"梦魇"。In The Object System, Baudrillard found a basis for the legal preservation of antiquities in the modern object system through the discussion of the "historical" atmosphere value of the antiquities and the symbolic value of the "origin myth". Following the systematic logic of structuralism, he arbitrarily reduced the intentionality of the antiquities into empty object codes, and incorporated them into the consumer society to carry out fierce criticism.In addition, due to the limitation of the subject’s philosophical vision, he analyzed the system of objects in a consumer society, and fell into a desperate "nightmare" because he ignored the basic dimensions of intersubjectivity and the possibility of reconciliation.

关 键 词：波德里亚 《物体系》 古物 结构主义 主体哲学 

分 类 号：B565.59[哲学宗教—外国哲学]