检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘春艳[1] 陈梦涛 LIU Chun-yan;CHEN Meng-tao(Department of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering,Yuncheng University,Yuncheng,China,044000)
出 处:《热能动力工程》2021年第3期100-105,共6页Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power
基 金:运城学院院级资助项目(XGK2020003)。
摘 要:为了改善传统PID控制器对锅炉汽包水位的控制效果,在传统PID控制的基础上,运用MATLAB软件,融入模糊控制算法,对锅炉汽包水位进行仿真研究,结果表明:采用模糊PID控制的锅炉汽包水位控制达到稳态的时间仅为0.0733 s,远小于常规PID控制所用的时间0.5 s;采用模糊PID控制的锅炉汽包水位控制产生的最大超调为0.06%,远小于常规PID控制产生的超调0.2%;采用模糊PID控制器进行控制,系统仅振荡了1次就进入稳态,系统的平稳性得到了很好的改善,平稳性及自适应方面均明显优于传统PID控制,控制效果更能达到工程实际要求.In order to improve the control effect of traditional PID controller on the boiler drum water lev-el,this paper uses MATLAB software based on the traditional PID control,integrated with fuzzy control algorithm,and simulates the water level of boiler drum.Simulation results show that the time needed to reach the steady state of the boiler drum water level control using fuzzy PID control is only 0.0733 s,which is far less than 0.5 s of the time used for conventional PID control.The maximum overshoot generated by boiler drum water level control using fuzzy PID control is 0.06%,which is far less than 0.2%of the overshoot generated by conventional PID control.The control system using fuzzy PID control only oscillates once before entering stable state,the stability of the system has also been improved,and the stability and self-adaptation are clearly better than those of the traditional PID control,so the resulting control effect can better meet the actual requirement of the project.
分 类 号:TP273[自动化与计算机技术—检测技术与自动化装置]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145