完善民事诉讼证明标准的路径探索  

A study on channels of perfecting the proof standard of civil litigation in China

作　　者：孙紫妍 SUN Ziyan(School of Law, East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 200042, China)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学法律学院,上海200042

出　　处：《镇江高专学报》2021年第2期42-46,共5页Journal of Zhenjiang College

摘　　要：随着法律体系的不断完善,我国形成了以“高度盖然性”标准为原则,以“排除合理怀疑”或“较大可能性”标准为例外的多层次民事诉讼证明标准体系,但适用中极易造成民事诉讼和刑事诉讼的混淆,甚至会对民事不法行为起到变相激励作用。应对现行民事诉讼证明标准作出调整,并考虑以证明标准以外的方法应对特殊待证事实的高证明要求。With the continuous improvement of the legal system, China has formed a multi-level civil litigation proof standard system, which takes the “high probability” standard as the principle and the “excluding reasonable doubt” or “greater possibility” standard as the exception. However, it tends to cause confusion between civil action and criminal action in application, and even plays a disguised incentive role in civil illegal acts. We should adjust the current standard of proof in civil litigation, and consider other ways instead of the standard of proof to meet the high requirements of special facts to be proved.

关 键 词：民事诉讼 证明标准 高度盖然性 排除合理怀疑 优势证据 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]