检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蒋晓萍[1] 陈微子 邓聪 JIANG Xiaoping;CHEN Weizi;DENG Cong(School of Foreign Studies,Guangzhou University,Guangzhou Guangdong 510006,China)
出 处:《长沙大学学报》2021年第3期85-92,共8页Journal of Changsha University
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“跨文化交际伦理规范构建研究”,编号:18YJA740017。
摘 要:《人民日报》是中国新闻报道的重要交流窗口,自新冠肺炎疫情暴发以来,《人民日报》就疫情相关情况进行了一系列跟踪报道。在此背景下,依据哈贝马斯的交往行为理论,以语言有效性要求的真实性、正确性和真诚性三要素为切入点,分析《人民日报》微信公众号新冠肺炎疫情报道的语言有效性,发现其在调节式、记述式、表现式言语行为三方面基本遵循了语言的有效性要求。但在记述式和表现式言语行为中,存在两大违背语言有效性原则的现象:真实性把控不严和真诚性意向不足。基于此,提出相应的提升路径,以期为主流媒体实现言语行为的有效性和合理性提供参考。As an important window for exchanging Chinese news reports,People’s Daily has conducted a series of the follow-up news reports on public health issue COVID-19. Against such a background,based on Jürgen Habermas’ s theory of communicative action,this paper starts from the three elements of language validity-truth, rightness and sincerity-to analyze the language validity of the COVID-19 news reports in People’s Daily on the WeChat platform. It is found that these reports conform to the validity claims of language observed in the areas of the regulatives,avowals and constatives of speech action,while there exists a violation of the validity claims of language in the areas of avowals and constatives of speech action including untruthful communicative content and insincere communicative intention. Based on the research findings,this paper puts forward two solutions with a view to providing some reference and implications for the mainstream media to realize the validity and rationality of language.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249