论詹姆逊的后现代主义文化批判理论  

On Jameson’s Cultural Criticism Theory of Postmodernism

作　　者：郭咔咔[1] GUO Ka-ka(Marxism School of Henan University,Kaifeng 475001,Henan,China)

机构地区：[1]河南大学马克思主义学院,河南开封475001

出　　处：《喀什大学学报》2021年第2期59-65,共7页Journal of Kashi University

基　　金：河南省教育厅人文社会科学研究项目“詹姆逊与齐泽克意识形态理论比较研究”(2020-ZDJH-027)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：詹姆逊的后现代主义文化批判理论,是以总体性的方法为理论工具,以生产方式为主符码,通过对资本主义的历史分期来确立其文化分期理论的,这使得詹姆逊认为,后现代主义是晚期资本主义的文化主导。这种后现代主义文化,渗透着资本的逻辑,从而呈现出文化和经济的交互作用,因此,其本质上的深度的消逝、其风格中的历史感的退却、其情感体验中的表意链断裂以及其空间维度的“崇高”成为后现代主义区别于现代主义的主要特征。这种后现代主义文化逻辑下的人们,丧失了反思性和批判力,呈现出主体的零散化和破碎性。为破解这种后现代主义的困境,詹姆逊倡导了以认知测绘美学为主要内容的文化政治解放图式。Jameson’s postmodernist cultural critical theory is based on the overall method as the theoretical tool,the mode of production as the main code,and establishes its cultural staging theory through the historical staging of capitalism,which makes James Xun believes that postmodernism is the cultural dominance of late capitalism.This kind of postmodernist culture is permeated with the logic of capital,thus presenting the interaction between culture and economy.Therefore,its essential depth disappears,the historical sense in its style fades,and the ideographic chain in its emotional experience breaks.And the“sublime”of its spatial dimension has become the main characteristic that distinguishes postmodernism from modernism.People under this postmodernist cultural logic have lost their reflective and critical power,showing the fragmentation and fragmentation of the subject;in order to solve this postmodernist dilemma,Jameson advocated the use of cognitive mapping aesthetics As the main content of the cultural and political liberation scheme.

关 键 词：后现代主义 文化批判 文化政治学 认知测绘 

分 类 号：G0[文化科学] I01[文学—文学理论]