医药卫生领域课程思政教学效果评价研究  被引量:27

Summary and Analysis of Teaching Effect Evaluation of Ideological and Political Education in the Courses in Medicine and Health Field

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:李缘媛 赵亮[1] 陈佳欣 张哲文[3] 邢丽娜 田金徽[3,4] LI Yuanyuan;ZHAO Liang;CHEN Jiaxin;ZHANG Zhewen;XING Lina;TIAN Jinhui(Evidence-based Nursing Center, School of Nursing, Lanzhou University, Gansu Lanzhou 730000, China;The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Gansu Lanzhou 730000, China;Evidence-based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Gansu Lanzhou 730000, China;Key Laboratory of Evidence-based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province,Lanzhou University, Gansu Lanzhou 730000, China)

机构地区:[1]兰州大学循证护理中心,兰州大学护理学院,甘肃兰州730000 [2]兰州大学第二临床医学院,甘肃兰州730000 [3]兰州大学循证医学中心,兰州大学基础医学院,甘肃兰州730000 [4]甘肃省循证医学与临床转化重点实验室,甘肃兰州730000

出  处:《中国医药导刊》2021年第6期477-480,共4页Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide

基  金:甘肃省科技计划项目(项目编号:20CX4ZA027,项目名称:中国循证社会科学发展对策研究);甘肃省高等教育教学成果培育项目(项目编号:202002,项目名称:项目导向·任务驱动·平台支撑——循证医学创新人才培养探索与实践);兰州大学教学改革研究项目[项目编号:JYXM(一般项目-基础)-2020-20195,项目名称:医学课程思政教学效果评价指标体系构建与实证研究];兰州大学教学改革研究项目[项目编号:JYXM(一般项目-基础)-2020-20216,项目名称:教师-学生视角下高等医学教育课程思政建设需求调查研究——以兰州大学为例]。

摘  要:目的:评价分析医药卫生领域“课程思政”的教学效果,探索医药学生课程思政教学实践,为我国开展课程思政教学改革提供参考。方法:计算机检索中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据库和CBM数据库获取课程思政研究,采用EndNote软件对文献进行去重和筛选,运用Excel软件和VOSviewer软件绘图。结果:问卷调查法是课程思政教学效果评价最常用的手段,排名第二位的是“三结合”,即问卷调查+形成性评价+终结性评价。结论:课程思政考核标准和评价系统需要进一步完善,单一的终结性评价或问卷调查较难全面反映课程思政的教学效果,亟待探索多维定性和定量、近期和远期、教师和学生评价相结合的教学效果评价体系。Objective:To evaluate and analyze the teaching effect of“ideological and political education in the courses”in the field of medicine and health,and explore the practice of ideological and political education of medical students,to provide reference for carrying out curriculum ideological and political teaching reform.Methods:The CNKI,Wanfang and CBM databases were searched to obtain studies on ideological and political education in the courses.The EndNote software was used to de-duplicate and select,and Excel and VOSviewer were used to draw graphs.Results:Questionnaire survey method is the most common method to evaluate the teaching effect of“ideological and political education in the courses”.The second most common method is the combination of“three methods”,which is questionnaire survey+formative evaluation+summative evaluation.Conclusion:The assessment standards and evaluation systems of ideological and political education in the courses need to be further improved.It is difficult for a single summative evaluation or questionnaire survey to fully reflect the effects of ideological and political education in the courses.It is urgent to explore an effect evaluation system which combines multi-dimensional qualitative and quantitative method,short term and long term evaluation,and the evaluation of both teachers and students.

关 键 词:课程思政 教学效果 评价方法 医药卫生领域 

分 类 号:R-1[医药卫生] G642[文化科学—高等教育学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象