检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:钟远珊 ZHONG Yuan-Shan(Guangdong Food and Drug Vocational College,Guangzhou 510520,China)
出 处:《食品安全质量检测学报》2021年第11期4683-4687,共5页Journal of Food Safety and Quality
基 金:广东食品药品职业学院人文与社科基金(2019RW07)。
摘 要:食品安全风险评估是食品安全法制领域的一项基础性制度。近年来我国认真贯彻食品安全"四个最严"要求,食品安全形势不断好转,但与其他国家比较仍存在差距。本文以中日食品安全风险评估制度为研究对象,系统剖析了两国在食品安全风险评估立法情况、组织机构、启动机制、标准保障4个方面的差异。在借鉴日本食品安全风险评估制度的基础上,基于我国的实际情况,提出应当健全我国食品安全风险评估立法,提高我国食品安全风险评估机构的独立性,实现自上而下、自下而上的风险评估启动模式,建立统一、权威、科学的食品安全标准体系。通过完善我国的食品安全风险评估制度,以期提升食品安全监管水平,保障人民群众的身体健康。Food safety risk assessment is a basic system in the legal field of food safety.In recent years,China has conscientiously implemented the‘Four Strictests’requirements of food safety,and the situation of food safety has become better,but there is still a gap compared with other countries.This paper took the food safety risk assessment system of China and Japan as the research object,and systematically analyzed the differences between the 2 countries in 4 aspects:legislation,organization,start-up mechanism and standard guarantee.On the basis of Japan's food safety risk assessment system and China's actual situation,this paper proposed that we should improve China's food safety risk assessment legislation,promote the independence of China's food safety risk assessment institutions,realize the top-down and bottom-up risk assessment start-up mode,and establish a unified,authoritative and scientific food safety standard system.Through the improvement of China’s food safety risk assessment system,in order to improve the level of food safety supervision,and protect the health of the people.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.194.2