重德抑或重才伊藤仁斋与荻生徂徕教育观的共识与分歧  

Morality or Ability?The Consensus and Disagreement of Jinsai Itōand Sorai Ogyū’s Educational Views

作　　者：张晓霏 Zhang Xiaofei(Doctoral Student at Zhejiang University,China)

机构地区：[1]浙江大学人文学院

出　　处：《日语学习与研究》2021年第3期59-66,共8页Journal of Japanese Language Study and Research

基　　金：2017年度国家社会科学基金重大项目“中日文化交流史丛书”(项目批准号:17ZDA227)的阶段研究成果。项目主持人:葛继勇。

摘　　要：德与才是教育领域关于目标讨论的永恒主题。伊藤仁斋与荻生徂徕在此问题上产生了分歧。仁斋重德胜过才,徂徕尊才轻德,这从他们关于"性"和"道"的思想以及各自所持的实际立场中可以找到充分的依据。仁斋认为性中有德的潜力,而徂徕坚信性无好坏。仁斋把包含"仁义礼智"的人道从天道和地道中剥离出来,而徂徕认为道是圣王创造的关于如何治国平天下的理论。仁斋生于京都没落的商人之家,而徂徕是武士阶层出身。伊藤仁斋和荻生徂徕的德才观都表现出一定的实用性与功利性。The selection between morality and ability is an eternal topic in the discussion of goals in the education field.Jinsai Itōand Sorai Ogyūhad a disagreement on this issue.Jinsai Itōvalues morality over ability,while Sorai Ogyūvalues ability over morality.This is based on their thoughts on"sex"and"Tao"and their actual standpoints:Jinsai believes that sex has the potential for morality,while Sorai considers sex is not good or bad.Jinsai separated humanity including"benevolence,justice,proprieties and wisdom"from natural law and universal law,while Sorai believes Tao is the theory on how to govern the country and level the world created by the sage sovereign.Jinsai was born to a fading merchant family in Kyoto,and Sorai came from a warrior background.Jinsai and Sorai’s views on morality and ability both show practicality and utilitarian efficiency.

关 键 词：德才观 伊藤仁斋 荻生徂徕 日本 儒学 

分 类 号：B313.3[哲学宗教—外国哲学]