庭审改革与诉权保障  

The Reform of Court Trial and Guarantee the Right to Sue

作　　者：丁朋超 Ding Pengchao

机构地区：[1]广东财经大学法治与经济发展研究所

出　　处：《人权研究（辑刊）》2021年第1期204-227,517,518,共26页Journal of Human Rights

基　　金：广东高校科研青年创新人才类项目“高素质法律职业共同体养成路径研究”(2018WQNCX045)的阶段性成果.

摘　　要：目前我国当事人诉权保障面临着立法、司法及理念层面不足的问题,造成这些问题的原因可归结为理论纷杂、制度缺陷和司法压力三个层面。现代庭审理论注重案件争点的确定、失权制度的落实,并要求法官在案件审判过程中履行阐明义务,做到心证公开。该理论能够体现诉讼民主、诉讼规律和程序保障,以争点整理引领的现代庭审方式能够实现案件的集中审理以及突袭裁判的有效防止,并能够为当事人诉权提供制度化保障。我国应在现代庭审理论的指引下,建立争点整理引领的集中审理制度、注重法官阐明义务的行使和心证公开、用公共理性重塑当事人的程序主体参与权,以此实现当事人诉权保障的价值追求。The protection of litigant’s right of action had faced with the problems of legislation,judicature and idea in our country.The causes of these problems can be summed up in three aspects:the theory is complex,the system is defective and the judicial pressure.The modern court trial theory pays attention to the determination of the dispute points and the implementation of the system of loss of power,and requires the judge to perform the obligation of clarification and the publicity of the evidence.The theory can reflect the democracy of litigation,the law of litigation and the procedural guarantee.The modern court trial mode led by the sorting of disputes can realize the centralized trial of cases and the effective prevention of the sudden judgment,and can provide the institutionalized guarantee for the litigants,right of action.Under the guidance of modern court trial theory,China should establish a centralized trial system led by the sorting of disputes,pay attention to the exercise of the obligation of the judge to clarify,and reshape the procedural subject’s participation right of the parties with public rationality,so as to realize the value pursuit of the protection of the parties’litigation rights.

关 键 词：诉权 庭审改革 庭审理论 争点整理 法官阐明 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]