检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张新星[1,2] 刘新梅 ZHANG Xinxing;LIU Xinmei(School of Management,Xi'an Jiaotong University,Xi'an 710121,China;The Key Lab of the Ministry of Education for Process Control and Efficiency Engineering,Xi'an 710121,China)
机构地区:[1]西安交通大学管理学院,西安710121 [2]西安交通大学过程控制与效率工程教育部重点实验室,西安710121
出 处:《科学学与科学技术管理》2021年第7期157-172,共16页Science of Science and Management of S.& T.
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(71572140)。
摘 要:基于分类加工模型,探讨了亲社会动机情境因素下,建设性争辩作为中介的信息型子团队均衡与团队创造力之间影响机制研究。运用96个研发团队、533名团队成员的样本数据分析,对所提出的假设进行了实证检验,结果表明:高团队亲社会动机下,信息型子团队均衡能够促进建设性争辩;建设性争辩正向促进团队创造力;高团队亲社会动机下,信息型子团队均衡会通过促进建设性争辩提升团队创造力。The survival and growth of organizations depend on the creativity generated by the collision of knowledge and information from diverse R&D teams. However, in a diverse team composed of team members with different knowledge structures, educational backgrounds and years of service, team members will form information-based faultlines due to their similarity of task attributes, and then divide the team into subgroups of different sizes. Different sizes of information-based subgroups not only bring diversified knowledge and information, but also generate the phenomena of"balance of power "or"the words of the lowly carry little weight", which may lead to conflicts or collective thinking within the team. Therefore, it has become a pressing issue for the team to resolve the antagonistic conflicts within the team, to take full advantage of the diversity of knowledge, to generate positive and constructive controversy behaviors within the team, and to ultimately enhance team creativity.Based on the categorization-elaboration model, the present study explored the mechanism between the balance of information-based subgroups and team creativity, which verified the mediation role of constructive controversy and the moderation role of prosocial motivation.The categorization-elaboration model states that a diverse subgroups structure triggers elaboration processes and social categorization processes that bring diverse knowledge to the team, while also generating social categorization due to the differences among members. The existence of information-based subgroups brings diverse knowledge to the team, but at the same time, the size status of subgroups affects the relationship status within the team. The unbalanced state of information-based subgroups makes the team prone to collective thinking, while the balanced state of information-based subgroups leads team members antagonistic conflict and intergroup bias. The prosocial motivation makes members identify more with the team and are willing to self-reflect and think about other
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.116.235.184