检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谢重光[1] Xie Chongguang(Fujian Normal University,Fuzhou Fujian,350008)
出 处:《地方文化研究》2021年第3期1-9,共9页Local Culture Research
基 金:国家社科基金重大项目“多卷本全球客家通史”(项目编号:17ZDA194)阶段性成果。
摘 要:回顾两百年来的客家源流研究,分歧迭出,主要观点有中原移民后裔说、土著说、本地说、北方土著说、融合说等。客家源流研究之所以如此众说纷纭,源于研究取向和研究范式的根本差别。二百年来,基本的研究取向或研究范式,可概括为汉人移民史研究范式、宽泛运用“族群”概念的研究范式、区域开发史背景下的文化融合研究范式等三种。文章对有关客家源流的诸种观点及诸种重要的研究范式作了扼要的述评。Looking back on the study of Hakka origins in the past two hundred years,differences have emerged one after another.The main points of view include the theory of the descendants of the Central Plains immigrants,the indigenous theory,the local theory,the northern indigenous theory,and the integration theory.The reason why the research on Hakka origin is so diverse is due to the fundamental difference between research orientation and research paradigm.In the past two hundred years,the basic research orientation or research paradigm can be summarized as the research paradigm of Han immigration history,the research paradigm of broadly using the concept of"ethnic group",and the research paradigm of cultural integration under the background of regional development history.The article briefly reviews various views on the origin of Hakka and various important research paradigms.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7