检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨红梅 Yang Hongmei(School of Information,Minzu University of China,Beijing 10081,China)
出 处:《中南财经政法大学研究生论丛》2021年第4期154-162,共9页Journal of the Postgraduates of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
摘 要:司法解释第32条第1款虽然沿用了享受养老保险待遇或退休金的超龄劳动者与用人单位构成劳务关系的观点,但司法实践并未依该规定统一认定超龄劳动者与用人单位之间的用工关系。其原因主要在于“按劳务关系处理”与实质劳动关系相悖,“养老保险待遇”范围不明确,以及能否“反推”认定劳动关系尚无定论。对此,可通过引入特殊劳动关系理论以代替“按劳务关系处理”,将“养老保险待遇”限缩解释为“城镇职工养老保险”,将既有司法解释规定扩张解释为可“反推”认定劳动关系等思路,调和司法解释规定与司法实践现状之间的偏差。Paragraph 1 of Article 32 of the Judicial Interpretation adopts the view that the composition of over-age workers enjoying old-age insurance benefits or pension benefits and the employer is based on service relationship,but the judicial practice does not uniformly identify the employment relationship between over-age workers and the employer.The reasons include the contradiction between“treatment according to service relationship”and the actual labor relationship,the unclear scope of“pension insurance benefits”,and whether the“reverse deduction”can determine the labor relationship is still unclear.In this regard,we can solve the problem by introducing the theory of special labor relations instead of“treating according to service relations”,explaining the limited reduction of“pension insurance benefits”as“endowment insurance for urban workers”,and explaining the expansion of existing judicial interpretations as“backward deduction”to identify labor relations.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33