显性反讽标记的元语用阐释  

A Metapragmatic Account of Explicit Irony Markers

作　　者：赵旻燕[1] Zhao Minyan(Ningbo University of Technology,Ningbo 315211)

机构地区：[1]宁波工程学院外语学院,宁波315211

出　　处：《浙江社会科学》2021年第9期115-121,159,共8页Zhejiang Social Sciences

基　　金：教育部人文社科项目(青年基金项目):基于语料库与眼动实验的汉语元语言否定及其认知加工研究(20TJC740103)。

摘　　要：显性反讽标记在言语反讽和情景反讽中的分布有着显著的差异,这种差异可以在元语用理论的分析框架下得到深入、统一的阐释:作为元语用指示语,显性反讽标记是使用者的元语用意识在语言层面的体现,使用者对反讽标记词与反讽行为之间的概念距离阻止了言语反讽中显性标记的使用,情景反讽则无此概念距离,因而显性反讽标记在情景反讽中不受限。而情景反讽中,反讽标记体现了使用者对这种语言行为的操控,有助于使用者构建反讽情景、进行评价和表明立场,以及为受话者提供解读框架。There is a significant difference in the distribution of explicit irony markers between verbal irony and situational irony,which can be explained in depth and in a coherent way under the framework of metapragmatic theory:as metapragmatic indicators,explicit irony markers are the realization of users’metapragmatic awareness at the linguistic level,and the conceptual distance between users’concept of irony markers and their concept about the language action of irony makes it impossible for the use of explicit irony markers in verbal irony,while in situational irony,there is no such conceptual distance.The use of irony markers in situational irony reflects the users’manipulation of ironic language.Irony markers help users construct ironic situations,express their stance,and provide schema for interpretation.

关 键 词：显性反讽标记 元语用 情景反讽 言语反讽 概念距离 

分 类 号：H030[语言文字—语言学]