检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王莉[1] 周焕发 张辉容 Wang Li;Zhou Huanfa;Zhang Huirong(The Affiliated Changsha Central Hospital,Hengyang Medical school,University of South China,Hunan Changsha 410004)
机构地区:[1]南华大学附属长沙中心医院,湖南长沙410004
出 处:《中国社区医师》2021年第26期189-190,共2页Chinese Community Doctors
摘 要:目的:探讨PBL联合CBL教学法在全科医师规范化培训中的效果。方法:选择2018年10月-2020年11月进行全科医师规范化培训的学员49人,按教学方法不同分为两组。观察组采用PBL联合CBL教学法;对照组采用传统LBL教学法。比较两组教学效果。结果:观察组出科考试成绩及教学满意度均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:PBL联合CBL教学法在全科医师规范化培训中的效果优于传统LBL教学法。Objective:To explore the effect of PBL combined with CBL teaching method in the standardized training of general practitioners.Methods:From October 2018 to November 2020,49 students who received standardized training for general practitioners were selected and divided into two groups according to different teaching methods.The observation group adopted PBL combined with CBL teaching method.The control group adopted traditional LBL teaching method.The teaching effect between the two groups was compared.Results:The examination scores and teaching satisfaction of the observation group were higher than the control group,with the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:The effect of PBL combined with CBL teaching method in the standardized training of general practitioners is better than the traditional LBL teaching method.
关 键 词:PBL+CBL教学法 全科医师 规范化培训
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.192