扎根理论迭代过程在体育学研究中的运用经验与问题——基于SSCI和CSSCI数据库的分析  

The Using Experience and Problems of Grounded Theory Iterative Process in Sports Science——Based on Analysis of Literature in SSCI and CSSCI

作　　者：林志义 杨海晨[1] LIN Zhiyi;YANG Haichen(College of PE and Sport Science,Fujian Normal University,Fuzhou 350108,China;Department of Sports Management,Fujian Sports Vocational Education and Technical College,Fuzhou 350001,China)

机构地区：[1]福建师范大学体育科学学院,福州350100 [2]福建体育职业技术学院体育管理系,福州350001

出　　处：《体育与科学》2021年第5期72-82,共11页Sports & Science

基　　金：2017年国家社会科学基金重点项目“闽台民间体育融合发展的参与式治理研究”,项目号:17ATY012;。

摘　　要：50年来,扎根理论已然发展成一套系统的方法策略,各大流派在某些方面虽有歧见,却也形成了一些重要的共识,其中便包含迭代过程。但总体而言,体育学采用扎根理论的研究成果,在迭代过程的运用方面尚有诸多值得探讨的空间。通过对扎根理论方法原著与SSCI、CSSCI期刊中相关体育学文献的回顾,围绕迭代过程的核心要素,探究当前采用扎根理论作为研究方法的体育学文献对迭代过程的认识偏差,并分析成因。研究表明,迭代过程是一种基于资料收集-理论性抽样-连续性比较交互作用的动态步骤,但学界部分成果因对迭代过程的使用偏差与学理性认识不足,致使在运用扎根理论时破坏了它的方法整体性。具体问题如下:多数研究并未对迭代过程予以清晰地呈现;访谈提纲僵化;多种抽样方式的混淆替代或错用;对连续性比较技术存在狭义认识;对迭代过程的总体性认识不足。在此基础上,提出研究者需对既有的研究规范性持中立态度,并从经典原著中寻找理论支撑,灵活运用迭代各要素;还需在文中对迭代过程予以清晰地呈现。Grounded theory has become a set of systematic method strategy in 50 years.Although the major schools of Grounded Theory have differences opinions in some aespects,there are still some common features,which include the iterative process.On the whole,there is still much discussion on the application of iterative process in grounded theory of Sports Science at home and abroad.Through the review on Grounded Theory literature in SSCI and CSSCI,this study discusses its understanding deviation of Grounded Theory research in Sports Science and analyze its reason on the basis of combing the core elements of iterative process.Research shows that the iterative process is a kind of dynamic interaction step based on data collection-theoretical sampling-constant comparisons.However,because of using deviation and insufficiency understanding in theory,studies destroyed their integrity.Details are as follows:the iterative were not presented in many studies;there were rigid data collection plans;there were confusion and misusing in theoretical sampling;the narrow understanding of constant comparisons often existed in studies;some studies lacked of overall understanding in iterative process.On this basis,it is proposed that we should hold neutral attitude toward the normative of studies and seek theoretical support from the original works;afterthat we can use iterative process skillfully;the iterative process ought to be presented clearly in research.

关 键 词：体育学 扎根理论 SSCI CSSCI 迭代过程 认识偏差 

分 类 号：G80-3[文化科学—运动人体科学]