在事实与规则之间:亚里士多德人性理论的规范性  

Between Facts and Rules: Aristotle's Normalization in His Theory of Human Nature

作　　者：薛舒文 陈晓川 Xue Shuwen;Chen Xiaochuan(School of Marxism,Guizhou University,Guiyang 550001,China;School of History and Politics,Guizhou Normal University,Guiyang 550025,China)

机构地区：[1]贵州大学马克思主义学院,贵阳550001 [2]贵州师范大学历史与政治学院,贵阳550025

出　　处：《学术交流》2021年第7期32-40,191,共10页Academic Exchange

基　　金：贵州省哲学社会科学规划项目“基于康德两种自由概念的道德主体建构研究”(19GZYB59);教育部人文社会科学西部项目“康德式道德主体的建构与证成研究”(20XJC720001)。

摘　　要：伦理学理论无可避免地要预设或者发明某种人性观念,然而伦理学理论以及生活形式的多样性本身又意味着某种统一的人性观念之不可能。我们是否能够拥有一种可以为伦理学奠基的人性论就成为任何伦理学理论所必须面对的问题。亚里士多德的伦理学恰是通过人性论来建构其伦理学理论的,并且具有典范的意义。这一建构过程清晰地显现于《尼各马可伦理学》的“功能论证”(ergon argument)之中。对这一论证的考察力图显示出:一种基于人性论的伦理学理论如何既避免了偏狭的人性论预设又没有失掉伦理学应有的规范性要求。Ethical theory inevitably presupposes or invents the human nature of a certain kind,but the diversity of ethical theory and life forms mean that a unified concept of human nature is impossible.Whether we can acquire the theory of human nature laying the basis for ethics has become a problem that any ethical theory must face.Aristotle's ethics constructs his ethical theory through the theory of human nature,and has exemplary significance.This construction process shows the"ergon argument"in The Nicomachean Ethics.The investigation of this argument tries to show how an ethical theory based on human nature theory not only avoids the narrow presupposition of human nature theory,but also fails to lose the due normative requirements of ethics.

关 键 词：人性 功能论证 德性伦理学 

分 类 号：B82[哲学宗教—伦理学]