检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王云兰[1] Wang Yunlan(School of Education,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang 330022)
出 处:《心理学探新》2021年第3期255-259,共5页Psychological Exploration
基 金:全国教育科学“十三五”规划2017年度课题“职业化视域下大学校长胜任特征模型及其选任制度研究”(BIA170213)。
摘 要:基于个体中心的视角考察大学校长胜任力和职业认同的关系,采用大学校长胜任力量表和职业认同量表对262名大学校长进行问卷调查。运用潜在剖面分析方法进行数据分析,结果表明:(1)大学校长胜任力可以分为四种潜在类别:低胜任力组、中胜任力组、高特质低能力组,高胜任力组,其中,中胜任组人数最多,高特质低能力组人数最少;(2)大学校长的职业认同得分在这四种潜在类别上有显著差异,中胜任力组、高胜任力组的大学校长职业认同得分显著高于高特质低能力组和低胜任力组,低胜任力组的大学校长职业认同显著于高于高特质低能力组。To explore the potential classes of university presidents’competence and its relationship with professional identityfrom the perspective of individual-centered,262university presidents were recruited to complete competencescaleand career identity scale.Potential profile analysis was used to analysis data.Results showed that:(1)University presidents’competence was divided into four classes:Low competenceclass,moderate competenceclass,high trait low ability class and high competenceclass.(2)University presidents’professional identityhad significant differences in the four classes.The competence’scores of high competenceclass and moderate competenceclass were significantly higher than that of high trait low ability class and low competenceclass.The competence’scores of high trait low ability class was significantly lower than that of low competenceclass.Findings revealed new insights into the relationship between university presidents’competence and professional identity and had significant implications for university presidents’competence.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.209