《教育法》第77条修订之解读:动因、变化及意义  

Interpretation of Article 77 of the Education Law(Amendment 2021):Rationales,Changes and Significance

作　　者：申素平 王子渊 SHEN Suping;WANG Ziyuan

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学教育学院,北京100872

出　　处：《中国人民大学教育学刊》2021年第3期43-51,共9页Renmin University of China Education Journal

基　　金：中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)重大项目“基于受教育权的中国教育法体系化研究”(21XNL007)。

摘　　要：准确理解2021年《教育法》法律责任部分第77条之修订具有重要意义。此次修订针对我国受教育权法律保护不足、特别是冒名顶替入学法律责任规定不充分的现实,从条文体量、调整内容、责任主体和责任承担方式四个方面进行修订,新增对滥用职权和玩忽职守两种招生违法行为的规制、冒名顶替者、故意被顶替者和帮助者应当承担的行政法律责任和被顶替者享有入学资格恢复请求权等内容,强化了教育法律责任的惩罚功能和补救功能,完善了我国以保护受教育权为核心的教育法律责任体系。It is of great significance to accurately understand the amendments of Article 77 in the legal liability part of the Education Law 2021.Because the legal protection of the right to education in our country is insufficient,especially in terms of legal liability investigation around the issue of impersonation admission,Article 77 of the Education Law has made revisions in the following aspects.The changes include:Clearly regulating the two illegal acts of abuse of power and dereliction of duty,clarifying the administrative legal liability of the replacers and those who help them as well as the replaced ones,and the replaced ones’right to request for the restoration of admission.To conclude,the Revised Law strengthens the punishment function and remedy function of education legal liability,improving the legal liability centered on the protection of the right to education.

关 键 词：教育法 受教育权 教育法律责任 冒名顶替 

分 类 号：G40-011.8[文化科学—教育学原理]