检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贾冬威[1] 潘志强[1] 卢文丽[1] 梁超[1] 彭佩克 方肇勤[1] 刘小美[1] Jia Dongwei;Pan Zhiqiang;Lu Wenli;Liang Chao;Peng Peike;Fang Zhaoqin;Liu Xiaomei(School of Basic Medical Sciences,Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Shanghai 201203)
出 处:《中医教育》2021年第5期73-76,79,共5页Education of Chinese Medicine
基 金:上海中医药大学第18期课程建设项目(No.2019SHUTCM022,No.2019SHUTCM023);上海中医药大学学科能力提升项目(No.A1-Z203020107);上海中医药大学基础医学院攀登计划(No.A1-GY201010101)。
摘 要:通过在实验中医学课程考核方式中引入探究性学习实践,发现学生在理论向科研实践过渡的过程中,暴露出的一系列问题。由此,在学生探究性学习基础上,加入个性化辅导的教学环节,针对每名学生的探究性学习报告,评价其科研设计的优势及薄弱环节、分析问题原因、找到解决思路,帮助学生构建完整的科研思维框架。结果显示,个性化辅导有助于学生对本课程知识点的巩固,学生探究性学习报告的成绩及科研设计的各方面能力均有显著提升。据此形成的"理论学习—探究性学习(暴露问题)—个性化辅导(解决问题)"教学模式,更有助于学生科研思维的形成,从而实现本课程的教学目标。Some problems occurred in the evaluation of Experiments of Traditional Chinese Medicine( TCM)concerning the transition from theory to research practice when inquiry-based learning was introduced in the course.We reinforced the inquiry-based learning by applied individualized guidance,that is,personal guidance for each student’s research report. We evaluated the strengths and weaknesses of students’ research design,analyzed the causes of problems,and helped them find solutions to build a systematic scientific research thinking framework.The results showed that individualized guidance helped students consolidate the knowledge of this course. Meanwhile,the quality of students’ inquiry research report and the ability of research design were significantly improved as well. The mode of "theoretical learning-inquiry-based learning( exposing problems)-individualized guidance( solving problems) "contributed to the formation of research thinking so as to achieve the teaching objectives of this course.
分 类 号:G642.3[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117