检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蒿莹莹 马晓凯 张琳 朱政[1] 曹振波[1,3] HAO Yingying;MA Xiaokai;ZHANG Lin;ZHU Zheng;CAO Zhenbo(School of Kinesiology, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, China;Institute of Physical Education, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu Province, China;Shanghai Research Center for Physical Fitness and Health of Children and Adolescents, Shanghai 200438, China)
机构地区:[1]上海体育学院运动科学学院,中国上海200438 [2]江苏师范大学体育学院,中国徐州221116 [3]上海市学生体质健康研究中心,中国上海200438
出 处:《教育生物学杂志》2021年第5期387-392,共6页Journal of Bio-education
摘 要:目的探讨现有基础代谢率(basal metabolic rate,BMR)方程预测青少年BMR的准确性。方法选取22名14~18岁的青少年为受试对象。使用修订版Harris-Benedict方程、Kath-McArdle方程、Henry方程,Schofield-1方程、Schofield-2方程、世界卫生组织推荐方程、Muller方程、Herman方程和Tverskaya方程计算BMR预测值,采用高精度能量代谢舱对BMR进行实测,评价预测值和实测值之间的差异性及一致性。结果修订版Harris-Benedict和Tverskaya方程计算的男性青少年BMR预测值与实测值的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);Kath-McArdle、Tverskaya和Muller方程计算的女性青少年BMR预测值与实测值的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。等效检验的结果显示,所有BMR预测值与实测值之间的一致性均较差。结论由去脂体质量指标所建立的BMR预测方程的准确性优于由身高、体质量和年龄等指标所建立的BMR预测方程,所有方程的BMR预测值与实测值的一致性均较差,提示未来需要在大样本量的基础上建立适合中国青少年人群的BMR预测方程。Objective To determine the accuracy of basal metabolic rate(BMR)equations in predicting basal metabolic rates of Chinese adolescents.Methods Twenty-two participants aged 14-18 years were enrolled.The predicted BMRs were gained by revised Harris-Benedict equation,Kath-McArdle equation,Henry equation,Schofiled-1 equation,Schofield-2 equation,World Health Organization(WHO)equation,Muller equation,Herman equation,and Tverskaya equation.BMRs were measured in a 24-hour activity cycle in a metabolic chamber.Then,the difference and agreement were evaluated between the measured values and predicted values.Results There were no significant differences between the predicted values of the revised Harris-Benedict and Tverskaya equations and the measured values in male adolescents(P>0.05).There were no significant differences between the predicted values of Kath-McArdle,Tverskaya,and Muller equations and the measured values in female adolescents(P>0.05).However,there was no agreement between measured values and predicted values by all equations according to the equivalence test.Conclusion The accuracy of the BMR predictive equation established by fat-free body mass indicator is better than the BMR predictive equation established by indicators such as height,body mass,and age.The BMR predicted values of all equations are in poor agreement with the measured values.In the future,it is necessary to establish predicted equations of BMR for Chinese adolescents based on a large sample population.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30