检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘鸿燕 肖风 LIU Hongyan;XIAO Feng(Department of Education Science,Shanxi Normal University,Linfen 041004)
出 处:《心理研究》2021年第5期411-417,共7页Psychological Research
基 金:国家自然科学基金青年项目(NSFC31800955)。
摘 要:研究旨在探讨类比推理两种经典范式间的关系,以及认知风格作为个体差异变量起着何种作用。实验采用两因素被试间完全随机设计,自变量为有无经典类比训练及场认知风格。结果发现,无论有无训练,场独立型被试表现均好于场依存型被试;接受训练后,场依存型被试成绩明显提高,场独立型被试受训练影响较小。研究证明了经典类比训练对问题类比推理能力有明显的促进作用,且场认知风格影响了问题类比推理源靶问题匹配关系的确定。The present study aimed to explore the relationship between the two classical paradigms of analogical reasoning and the role of cognitive style as a variable of individual differences.The experiment was a two-factor randomized experimental design,and the independent variables were classical analogical training and field cognitive style.The results showed that no matter with or without training,the performances of the participants with field independence were better than the ones with field dependence,while the latter ones improved their performances after training.Thus,classical analogical training can improve problem analogical reasoning ability,while field cognitive style affected the determination of the pairing relationship between the source problem and the target problem in analogical reasoning test.
分 类 号:B842[哲学宗教—基础心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.106.159