检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:金衡山[1] Jin Hengshan
出 处:《四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2021年第6期83-92,共10页Journal of Sichuan University:Philosophy and Social Science Edition
摘 要:“跨学科”作为一种被期望能带来突破的研究方式,有其普遍的应用前景,也是外国文学研究界近年来时常讨论的对象。从美国文学研究的历史,追溯跨学科研究的渊源,可以发现跨学科研究方式的发展过程、留下的轨迹和产生的影响;从文化研究影响和西方文论的理论支撑中,可以看到跨学科方式的必要和必然。从中,既可勾勒出跨学科方式的历程,发现其特征所在;同时,也可以看到存在的问题,其中最为明显的是文学研究中过分偏向政治立场的倾向,以及脱离文学性谈文学的现象。跨学科方式的学理根源于“共同问题意识”,但就文学研究而言,无论怎么“跨”学科,都不能离开文学的本体性。The interdisciplinary approach has been universally acknowledged as a valuable method highly recognized in the circle of foreign literature studies in China in recent years.Based on the perspective in studies of the history of American literature as a discipline,it is possible to find out the scenarios showing how the interdisciplinary approach has already been employed and how much achievement it has made.At the same time,one also needs to take into consideration the influence of the Cultural Studies and Western critical theories over the past decades on the interdisciplinary approach.Meanwhile,some problems with this interdisciplinary approach have emerged,for instance,the inclined effort to replace literary studies with the critique of overloaded political intention.As a result,literary studies has often been conducted without talking about literature itself.The interdisciplinary approach,in fact,originates from the consciousness of the common ground facing the social discourses,but no matter how many methods are used to promote it,literary studies should not proceed with no relation to the subjectivity of literature itself.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.63