佛医“四大”与中医“五行”之比较  

A Comparison of the"Four Great Elements"of Buddhist Medicine and the"Five Phases"of Traditional Chinese Medicine

作　　者：魏孟飞 WEI Meng-fei(School of Management, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, Henan, 450046, China)

机构地区：[1]河南中医药大学管理学院,河南郑州450046

出　　处：《南京中医药大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第3期162-166,共5页Journal of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：河南省中医药管理局重点项目(TCM2019008)。

摘　　要：作为传统医学的佛教医学和中医学分别在四大说和五行说的理论框架下构建了自身的医学体系。虽然佛医四大说与中医五行说在侧重于形体之属性与功能方面有相似之处,但二者在文化背景、理论模式、解释范围等方面均有显著差异。中国古代部分医家曾尝试将佛医四大说引入中医学,并对四大说和五行说进行调和,但四大说终因其解释力不超出五行说之范围而退出了中医学的历史舞台。Buddhist medicine and traditional Chinese medicine(TCM),as traditional medicine,have built their own medical systems respectively under the theoretical framework of the four great elements and the five phases.Although there are similarities between the four great elements theory of Buddhist medicine and the five phases theory of TCM in terms of their focus on the properties and functions of the physical body,there are significant differences between them in terms of cultural background,theoretical models and explanatory scope.Some ancient Chinese physicians attempted to introduce the four great elements theory of Buddhist medicine into TCM and to reconcile it with the five phases theory,but the four great elements theory eventually withdrew from the historical stage of TCM because their explanatory power did not exceed the scope of the five phases.

关 键 词：佛医 中医 四大 五行 

分 类 号：R22[医药卫生—中医基础理论]