现实主义的多重镜像--重提“功能现实主义”的历史线索与文学史意义  

Multiple Mirror Images of Realism:Revisiting the Historical Clues and Literary Historical Significance of“Functional Realism”

作　　者：顾奕俊 Gu Yijun

机构地区：[1]浙江大学传媒与国际文化学院,杭州310058

出　　处：《南京社会科学》2021年第11期131-140,共10页Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“社会主义文学经验和改革开放时代的中国文学研究”(19ZDA277);浙江省教育厅一般科研项目“1940年代七月诗派、革命根据地诗群、中国新诗派关系研究”(Y202146131);浙江大学中央高校基本科研业务费青年科研创新专项的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：20世纪三四十年代,布莱希特在现实主义与表现主义的论争中提出了"功能现实主义"这一概念,且通过一系列理论阐发与戏剧实践将其明晰化。之后,罗杰·加洛蒂、维尔纳·密滕茨威等人的文章著述在接续发展"功能现实主义"的同时,进一步彰显现实主义丰富而深刻的本体能力。而考察20世纪中国文学史的演变轨迹,则可注意到相应阶段特定作家、文艺理论家的观念论述与布莱希特所抛出的"功能现实主义"之间具有值得辨析的相似性。梳理"功能现实主义"的历史线索与文学史意义,显然是审视20世纪中国现实主义文学创作与理论批评的一个重要的路径视角,并由此展望中国现实主义文艺道路的前景。In the 1930 s and 1940 s,Brecht put forward the concept of“functional realism”in the debate of realism and expressionism,and clarified it through a series of theories and theatrical practice.After that,the articles of Roger Garaudy,Werner Mittenzwei and others further demonstrate the rich and profound ontologist ability while developing“functional realism”.To examine the evolution trajectory of the history of Chinese literature in the 20 th century,we can notice that there is a distinguishable similarity between the conceptual discourse of specific writers and literary theorists in the corresponding stage and the“functional realism”thrown out by Brecht.Combing through the historical clues of“functional realism”and the historical significance of literature is undoubtedly an important path perspective to examine the creation and theoretical criticism of Chinese realism literature in the 20 th century,and look forward to the prospect of Chinese realism literature and art.

关 键 词：布莱希特 功能现实主义 现实主义 20世纪中国文学史 

分 类 号：I0-03[文学—文学理论]