检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱锋 Zhu Feng(Shendong Technology Research Institute,Yulin 719315,China)
出 处:《煤矿机械》2021年第12期31-33,共3页Coal Mine Machinery
摘 要:为了探究哪种履带行走机构更适合煤矿井下灭火机器人,采用网络分析法(ANP)从行走能力、防爆难易和操控难易三方面对4种常见履带行走系统的性能进行了评价。对4种行走系统的空间通过性、最大越障高度、最大跨越沟壑宽度和底盘高度进行了理论建模和分析,并建立ANP模型对4种行走机构进行了定量评价。最终评价结果表明,倒梯形履带行走机构更适合煤矿灭火机器人。In order to explore which kind of crawler walking mechanism is more suitable for coal mine firefighting robot, the performances of four common crawler walking systems were evaluated from three aspects of walking ability, explosion-proof difficulty and control difficulty by using analytic network process(ANP). The space trafficability, the maximum obstacle height, the maximum gully width and the chassis height of the four walking systems were theoretically modeled and analyzed, and the ANP model was established to quantitatively evaluate the four walking mechanisms. Finally, the evaluation results show that the inverted ladder crawler walking mechanism is more suitable for coal mine firefighting robot.
分 类 号:TP242[自动化与计算机技术—检测技术与自动化装置]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.137.169.218