王弼易学是否可称“玄学派易学”  

Whether Wang Bi's Yi-ology can be called'Metaphysical Yi-ology'

作　　者：封顺帆 Feng Shunfan

机构地区：[1]复旦大学哲学学院

出　　处：《理论界》2021年第12期68-74,共7页Theory Horizon

摘　　要：魏晋时期,玄学思潮流行,作为“三玄”之一的周易成为士人重要的思想资源。而这种玄学思潮表现在解经上的一个重要特点就是,学者一扫传统的以象数注易的方式,删繁就简,以老庄中的丰富义理来解释周易。由此,后世学者将这一时期的易学命名为“玄学派易学”,并将王弼列为代表人物之一。但是,与其他玄学家相比,王弼的易学有一个显著的不.同,那就是他不仅攫取了老庄的思想资源,也包含有丰富的儒家思想。不仅如此,他也并未像后世学者所评价的那样“尽黜象数”。因此,是否可以用“玄学派易学”这一名称来定义王弼的易学,是一个值得商榷的问题。During the Wei and Jin Dynasties,metaphysics was popular,and Zhouyi,one of the Three Metaphysics',became an important ideological resource for scholars.An important feature of this metaphysical trend of thought in interpreting the Book of Changes is that scholars sweep away the traditional way of annotating the Book of Changes with images and numbers,cut down the complexity and simplify it,and explain the Book of Changes with the rich righteousness in Laozi and Zhuangzi.Therefore,later scholars named the Yi-ology in this period as'Metaphysical Yi-ology',and listed Wang Bi as one of the representative figures.However,compared with other metaphysicians,Wang Bi's Yi-ology has a significant difference,that is,he not only grabbed the ideological resources of Laozi and Zhuangzi,but also contained rich Confucian thoughts in the process of annotating Yi.What's more,he did not avoid the number-image system as later scholars commented.Therefore,We have well-founded reason to doubt whether Wang Bi's Yiology can be defined by the name of'Metaphysical Yi-ology'.

关 键 词：易学 王弼 玄学派易学 老子 儒家 

分 类 号：B235.2[哲学宗教—中国哲学]