检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:贾健[1] 张竞悦 JIA Jian;ZHANG Jing-yue(School of Law,Southwest University of Political Science & Law,Chongqing 401120, China)
出 处:《唐山学院学报》2022年第1期73-81,共9页Journal of Tangshan University
基 金:安徽省哲学社会科学规划青年项目(AHSKQ2017D27);西南政法大学科研创新项目(FXY2021049)。
摘 要:解决好监察对象与职务犯罪主体之间的衔接问题,是解决好《监察法》与《刑法》衔接问题的重点之一,此问题集中体现在《监察法》第15条与《刑法》的职务犯罪主体之间的衔接。据此,首先,应当以立法解释或者法律修正案的形式对《监察法》中的职务违法与职务犯罪的监察对象加以区分;其次,应当将公职单位纳入监察对象的范围;最后,在监察人员调查职务犯罪时,应对司法工作人员进行扩大解释,将监察人员解释为侦查人员。Solving the connection problem between the object of supervision and the subject of duty crime is one of the key points in solving the connection problem between the Supervision Law and the Criminal Law.This problem is epitomized by the connection between the subjects of the duty crime in Article 15 of Supervision Law and in Criminal Law.Therefore,in the first place,legal interpretations or legal amendments should be used in Supervision Law to distinguish the supervision objects between duty violations and duty crimes;Secondly,public units should be included in the scope of supervision objects;Finally,when the supervisory personnel investigate the duty crimes,judicial staff shall be offered an expanded interpretation,with the supervisory personnel interpreted as the investigators.
分 类 号:D922.114[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38