融贯性:刑法修订中的实践进阶  

Consistency:Practical Progress in Criminal Law Revision

作　　者：陈劲阳[1] Chen Jinyang

机构地区：[1]吉林大学法学院,长春130012

出　　处：《南京社会科学》2021年第12期91-98,共8页Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目“终身刑导入刑法衍生问题研究”(19YJA820003)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：自97新刑法实施以来,全国人大常委会先后对其进行了十二次修订。纵观历次刑法修订,我国刑法在不断的修订过程中更加趋于融贯,结构上更富有逻辑,保持罪刑关系设置的协调性、均衡性。遵从反思平衡的思维方式,考察历次刑法修订在促使刑法体系趋向融贯方面所呈现的特点,从诸多方面印证我国刑法体系融贯性的不同侧面:基于相同情况相同处理原则设定罪状、轻重有序兼顾平衡地设置罪刑关系、法律术语表述的协调与统一、法定刑配置的科学化与均衡化、规则的内部呼应与外部衔接趋于合理。Since the implementation of the new criminal Law in 1997,the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress has revised it 12 times.Throughout the past criminal law amendments,China’s criminal law in the process of continuous revision more tends to be consistent,more logical structure,to maintain the coordination and balance of the relationship between crime and punishment.Following the thinking mode of reflective balance,this paper investigates the characteristics of previous criminal law amendments in promoting the integration of the criminal law system,and verifies the different aspects of the integration of China’s criminal law system from many aspects:Based on the principle of the same case and the same punishment,the crime and punishment relationship is set up in a balanced way,the coordination and unity of legal terms,the scientific and balanced allocation of legal punishment,and the internal echo and external connection of rules tend to be reasonable.

关 键 词：刑法 修订 融贯性 罪刑关系 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]