《大同书》铅印本、石印本流传次序及其与康有为手稿关系考略  

On the Circulation Order of the Stereotype and Lithographic Editions of the Great Commonwealth and Their Relations with the Manuscript of Kang Youwei

作　　者：王水涣 Wang Shuihuan

机构地区：[1]北方工业大学马克思主义学院

出　　处：《中国出版史研究》2021年第4期69-86,共18页Research on the History of Publishing in China

基　　金：北京市教委基本科研业务费2019年度项目“1930年代党外学者马克思主义介绍与传播研究”的阶段性成果之一。

摘　　要：康有为《大同书》手稿与其生前两次铅印之甲乙二部存在较明显差异,与1935年版钱定安编辑之"十部本"也有结构区别。两种石印本《大同书》甲乙部的流传,以及20世纪30年代若干"大同"类著作对康氏思想或明或暗的引用或批评,均说明康氏大同思想在当时有较大影响力。康有为逝世后弟子们就整理出版《大同书》形成共识,以1929年甲乙部再版为开端,1935年钱定安编辑整理《大同书》十部全稿送交出版本有"辩诬"之意,却反而成为后来学者追认该书具有"空想社会主义"性质的文本凭借。The Great Commonwealth(Datongshu) manuscript of Kang Youwei varied obviously from the book’s first two parts printed in stereotype edition before his death, and was also structurally different from the ten-part edition(1935) edited by Qian Ding’an. The circulation of the first two parts of the Great Commonwealth in lithographic edition, together with the expressed or implied citation or criticism of the Kang Youwei thought in several books on the envisagement for commonwealth in the 1930 s indicated that the thought of Kang on founding a commonwealth was quite influential at the time. After Kang passed away, his students reached consensus on collation and publishing of the Great Commonwealth. The endeavors from the republishing of the first two parts of the Great Commonwealth in 1929 to the handover of all the ten parts edited by Qian Ding’an to the publishing house were intended to defend Kang Youwei against false accusations. However, these texts were used by later scholars to identify the book’s nature of utopian socialism.

关 键 词：《大同书》 康有为 梁启超 社会主义 文本学 

分 类 号：B258-5[哲学宗教—中国哲学] G239.29[文化科学]