陆学与禅学之辨  

Distinction Between Lu-doctrine and Zen

作　　者：蒋九愚[1] 宋从 JIANG Jiu-yu;SONG Cong(School of Political Science and Law,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang 330022,China;School of Marxism,Jiangxi Normal University,Nanchang 330022,China)

机构地区：[1]江西师范大学政法学院,江西南昌330022 [2]江西师范大学马克思主义学院,江西南昌330022

出　　处：《东华理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第6期538-546,共9页Journal of East China University of Technology(Social Science)

摘　　要：陆学与禅学之辨,是中国哲学史上朱、陆之争的一个重要方面。朱熹及其后继者对陆学"全是禅学"的批评和陆学及其后继者对陆学是"圣学"的辩护,各自包含深刻的合理性。陆象山始终坚持尊义去利的义利之辨,并从儒佛二者的思维表达方式、公私义利、道之偏正和经世出世等方面去阐明自己旨在"扬儒抑佛"的儒佛观。陆象山对佛教、禅宗的批评,具有浓厚的辩证理性主义色彩,超出了同时代新儒家的思想水平,非二程、朱熹所能比拟。陆象山在思维方式、实践工夫等方面不自觉地受到了佛教的深刻影响。陆学这种禅学化的新儒学,具有自己的理论特色,这一点往往被已有研究成果所忽视。The distinction between Lu-doctrine and Zen is an important aspect of the dispute between Zhu and Lu in the history of Chinese philosophy.Zhu Xi and his successors criticized that Lu-doctrine was"all Zen studies",but Lu Xiangshan and his successors defended that Lu-doctrine was"sacred studies".Their dispute respectively contained profound rationality.Lu Xiangshan always insisted on the distinction between righteousness and profit,and explained his viewpoints on Confucianism and Buddhism aiming at promoting Confucianism and suppressing Buddhism in terms of the way of thinking between Confucianism and Buddhism,public and private justice and benefit,the righteousness of Tao,and the birth of the world.Lu Xiangshan′s criticism of Buddhism and Zen has a strong dialectical rationalism color,which exceeds the ideological level of contemporary Neo-Confucianism and is beyond the reach of the Cheng brothers and Zhu Xi.Lu Xiangshan was naturally and unconsciously deeply influenced by Buddhism in terms of thinking and practice.The Zen-like Neo-Confucianism of Lu-doctrine has its own theoretical characteristics,which is often overlooked by the existing research results.

关 键 词：陆象山 陆学 儒佛之辨 禅学化 

分 类 号：B21[哲学宗教—中国哲学]