检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广州市越秀区青草青少年成长服务中心
出 处:《青年研究》2022年第1期60-72,96,共14页Youth Studies
基 金:上海市静安真爱梦想教育进修学院看见未来·儿童智库2020年度研究课题资助项目(2020CCTT01)阶段性研究成果。
摘 要:基于对广州市一所农民工子弟学校的“坏孩子”圈子的长期追踪,深描他们校内“混日子”、校外“找乐子”的文化实践,阐述其亚文化生产机制。研究发现,他们看似叛逆的行为是结构性压迫之下的自我保护及寻求认同感的策略,是教育体制和民办学校筛选、排斥非户籍“差生”的推力与吸引青年群体的消费社会和互联网经济的拉力双重作用的产物。从青少年视角出发的研究方式突破了“反学校文化”理论二元对立视角的局限,为理解当代中国青少年亚文化提供了新的思路。Based on the long-term tracking of the circle of“bad children”in a school for migrant workers’children in Guangzhou,this article tries to deeply describe their cultural practice of“passing time”within school and“finding fun”outside school,and elaborate the mechanisms for their subculture production.Regarding their seemingly rebellious behaviors,they are actually the strategies for self-protection and seeking recognition under the structural oppression;they are also the results of dual actions:one action is the pushing forces from the educational system and private schools,which might select and exclude the“bad students”without local household registration;the other action is the pulling forces from consumerist society and internet economy,which might attract youth group.This research way starts from the perspective of adolescents,which could break through the limitation of binary opposition regarding the theory of“counter-school culture”,and provide a new thinking for understanding contemporary Chinese adolescents’subculture.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49