检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:魏争[1] Wei Zheng(School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510640,China)
机构地区:[1]华南理工大学机械与汽车工程学院,广东广州510640
出 处:《湖北工程学院学报》2022年第1期69-73,共5页Journal of Hubei Engineering University
摘 要:比较中国和澳大利亚高校学术诚信教育,需要对国内外学术诚信教育认识的误区予以审视。通过对学术诚信现象的考察,剖析中澳高校学术诚信教育的差异与共识,从中西方高校学生的学业发展过程中找出差异产生的根源。对我国高校学术诚信教育的理念定位进行再思考,从而从中国高校实际的视角出发,思考澳大利亚高校学术诚信教育的合理要素如何被创新性吸收。To compare the academic integrity education between Chinese and Australian universities,there is need to examine the misunderstanding of the academic integrity education at home and abroad.This research analyzes the differences and consensus of the academic integrity education in Chinese and Australian universities through investigation about the phenomenon of academic integrity and find out the source of the differences in the process of the academic development of students from Chinese and western universities.The researcher thinks over about the concept positioning of the academic integrity education in Chinese universities,and thus may think about how the reasonable elements of the academic integrity education in Australian can be innovatively absorbed from the practical perspective of Chinese universities.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.195