检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:付梦华[1] FU Menghua(School of Law,Dalian Maritime University,Dalian Liaoning 116026,China)
出 处:《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2022年第2期121-132,173,共13页Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目“民法精神与建设社会主义法治文化民本模式研究”(14ZDC022)。
摘 要:《民法典》评注工作有助于提升中国民法学的教义化、科学化水平,整合民法学界的理论和实践资源,有助于建构中华民族的法律自信,同时构成与域外法学平等友好交往的中介。在“评注”的过程之中,要对法律文义、法律体系、立法目的、立法客观目的以及学理说明和经典案例等多种素材进行评论与注释,以注释带动评论、以评论推动注释。同时,在评注的体裁选择上,应当尊重官方与私人、理论界与实务界的评注成果,在其中适当地分配“评”与“注”的分量,更要强调学生教材和普法读物这种面向初学者和一般读者的“评注体裁”的创作。因此,作为一项任重而道远的工作,“民法典评注”需要法学知识共同体结合准体系化的法典、多样的审判经验与研究经验、一致性的法学方法论,最终实现民法学的教义化的“共同知识”理想。Commentary on the Civil Code contributes to the improvement of the doctrinal and scientific level of China’s science of civil law,integrating the theoretical and practical resources in the academic of civil law;contributes to the construction of the legal confidence of the Chinese nation;at the same time,constitutes the intermediary of equal and friendly contacts with foreign law.In the process of“commentary”,it is necessary to“comment”and“annotate”on various materials such as“legal text”,“legal system”,“legislative purpose”,“objective purpose of legislation”,“theoretical explanation”and“classic cases”;to drives the“comment”with“annotation”and to promotes the“annotation”with the“comment”.At the same time,in selecting the genre of commentary,we should respect the achievements of official and private,theoretical and practical circles,allocate the weight of“comment”and“annotation”appropriately,and give more emphasis on the creation of“annotation genre”oriented to beginners and general readers,such as“student textbooks”and“reading materials for popularizing law”.Therefore,as a heavy work with a long way to go,“commentary on the Civil Code”requires the combination of“legal knowledge community”with the quasi-systematic code,diversified experience of trial and research,and consistent legal methodology,so as to finally realize the doctrinal ideal of“common knowledge”of the science of civil law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.138.112.77